gang response
lonesome bert:
~White people have been riding herd over the darker souls on this
earth because they are SMARTER~
Some would say that's because the darker colored folks have had
the 'smarts or drive' bred out
through the husbandry of slavers.Domestication through selected
breeding,,evolution in action?
~EVERY winter here in Southern California,,,he lights a BAR-B-Q
in his HOUSE because it's cold.
That person is ALWAYS a Mexican. ~
Not so down here in Fla,,it's uneducated folks of all colors.
IOW,,stupid is as stupid does,bubba.
MKillie:
~"WANTING AIN'T GETTING!"~
That's what every one says,,untill they get tired of saying
it,,or um,,uh,,what?,,oh yeah,,
Or untill they get distracted from the problem.
Remember,,ADD is rising to epidemic proportions.Add that to a
fried education system.
And you have some one group getting what every one doesn't want.
baretta:
~buy a Glock 17~
Is it American made?
'BUY AMERICAN!!!'
c92:
I agree with you.
Let's get on it.You go vote and maybe I'll find someone to vote
for me.
Any one out there got a voting priveledge not being used?
IOW,,will you vote for me,,since I want to but can't and you can
yet don't?
jms46:
~That is why they want to take your guns away. You will not be
able to defend yourself when the
riots start. The rioters will have guns though because they can
break the law and get away with
it. ~
Criminals aren't the only ones with guns.Guns aren't the only
weapons criminals use.Have you
seen how rocks,machetes,propane tanks,cell phones and fertilizer
are used in the world?Not to
mention transport vehecles od all sorts.
So,,,Why limit the idea of defense to guns?
~if a white person had made any of those remarks it would have
been in the new for
a week or more and demands for apologies from all over the
world.~
Yeah,,ain't that odd?And they claim white folks are the racists.
Hey,,can you tell me,,How J.Imus is racist like A.Fox?
dragonsflame:
re:old men and young girls,,I agree that's considered perverted
yet,,if evolution is a fact
and we've evolved to where humans are maturing younger and are
apparently much smarter now,,
enough so to determine for themselves what those kids in the
bygone days weren't allowed
to decide,,like sex and abortion and so amny other things,,and
the girl nor her parents doesn't
mind,,so what?
Speaking as a 'highly evolved ape like creature that was produced
through billions of years and
millions of generations of evolution would',,old enuff ta
bleed,,old enuff to breed,,no?
And if you get a good dowry,,hey,,so much the better,,right?He'll
die way before her,,Anna NS
knew that.
re:Koresh,Jones,,these types are the kind used to demean the idea
of protecting one rights to
religion and arms for protection from miscreants,varmints and gov
persons gone batty.
They shouldn't be mentioned except as lessons in depravity and
zeal gone sour.
That's something that happens in allmost all group
activities.Including our gov.
santasbaby:
~I say, go for it and see how successful they'll be without the
'white' influence.~
They would holler that THAT wouldn't be fair.Just like your
comment would make them holler,,
YOU'RE A RACIST!
ralspals:
My belated condolences regarding your wife.
She sounded intelligent and fair minded.That is the attitude that
turned this melting
pot into something the world still envies.Allthough the envy has
become tainted by
spiteful hate lately.
Art_Schlonogger:
~Boy Brokeback Bert, if you think skin tone has anything to do
with intelligence you must have
flunked every biology course you ever took~
Yeah,,tell him dude,,biology has nothing to do with
genetics,animal husbandry nor evolution!
What a maroooooonic statement worthy of The Triune Diety of
Comedic Divinity.Hey,Art,what's
the difference between a house servant and a field hand?A
highland Haitian and a coastal
Haitian?An African American and an African?A cracker and a
w.a.s.p.?An American and an
Australian?A Seminole and a Blackfoot?A blue bird and a mocking
bird,,a chihuahua and a great
dane,,a blue rose and a red rose?And lets don't even mention
lizards,amphibians,molluscs,
cephalapods and fish,,or insects.
(sure,,it's not exclusive,,yet it can't be excluded)
So,,who failed what?
wpitcher:
~I think that there always some extreme examples of militants in
every society. I discount it,
because:~
To discount the extremes in a group is to allow,condone and abett
their attitues,behaviour
and overall effect in your decision making process.That would
make it unbalanced and not
inclusive of all knowable elements leading to 'bad choices' based
on 'bad intelligence'.
Just like what some claimed happened to Bush.
~1. Most people come here to get jobs so that they can make a
better life for their families.
The productivity of the current economic system is the mechanism
to create those jobs and
opportunities.~
Yay,,but the economy of the US is not the same as it was in the
past.
The productivity today is not equal to the 'manufacturing'
dominated economy of the past.
Competition for ag and service industry jobs will soon be a fact
of life for too many.
Unfortuanately,,the immigrants are from a culture where the
'subservient' mentality and
attitude has been ingrained for generations.This gives them a
decided advantage over the more
rights and respect acclimatized spoiled Americans when dealing
with such occupations.This makes
them much less desirable as hires since they will complain when
the boss mistreats or
disrespects them.
~2. They do not want to create another Mexico here, because they
decided to leave Mexico and its
extensive corruption, even worse than the U. S.~
See,,you are allready out of balance logically since you have
discounted the extremist/militant
examples.
To be intellectually honest,,you could simply say,,MOST don't
want to,,since honestly,,some do.
Re:Mexican corruption
Like Americans have done throughout history,ever since we
obtained soil that is,,they should
stay and fight to change their own nation.
That way maybe they could have a country with less corruption
than the US.
BTW,,how could 'their corruptive element' be affecting 'our
corruptive element in regards to
this entire issue?
~3. You may notice that most Mexican immigrants have dark skins
and evidence of indian ancestry.
If you look at Urban Mexico in its television, big business, and
colleges you see people of
lighter skin, and more European Characteristics. It is likely
that our laws here provide more
equality under the law and more opportunities.~
This is indicative of 'racism' in action.What I see going on is a
purge of their undesirables.
You may have noticed that even you say,,Most immigrants to
America have the darker skins
indicative of their Indian ancestry,yet their media shows many
other tones.
Why is it disproportionate?Could it be due to the corruptive
element you alluded to being
motivated in this issue by a racist bias?Aren't there
international laws prohibiting such?
~4. In the area where I live (Northern California) and New Mexico
(Recent visit to Albuquerque),
the second generation Latinos speak ENGLISH as their primary
language, have cell phones and go
to college.~
And this means what?They don't have such in Mexico?
You are raised in a language.Cells phones are a luxury.
Are you talking legal or illegal immigrants?
BTW,,I got turned down for colledge funding due to being a
felon.Yet there were and are
plenty of black and brown felons getting to go since they are
disadvantaged by being not white.
I keep looking for all the advantages I am supposed to have
because I am white and I have yet
to find any.I am free to live poor and die broke,,just like every
one else in the US is
supposed to be.
~You can create a lot of fear repeating the dialog of the
extremists, but nobody from Mexico
realistically wants to destroy this society, they just want to be
a part of it.~
You can create a lot of chaos,damage,destruction and suffering by
discounting the dialog of
the extremist element that does wish to destroy American
government or society.
And again,,like Bush,,faulty intelligent leads to faulty
conclusions,,right?
After all,,you can easily look around and find examples of folks
who wish to destroy our
government and the socio-cultural way of life.
If you wished to be intellectually honest and show no bias,,you
should simply say 'most','not
all' or 'some'.
But,,don't discount any element of the equation or the solution
will be incorrect.
Logically speaking that is.
romac:
~Do you have any quotes that were made in the last 10 yrs? All
those were in the early 90's.~
Are the people that said them still alive?If so,,or if they have
influenced others with those
ideologies,,it's still a valid concern.
If someone was quoted fifty years ago as saying,,'If you stand in
the middle of a freeway
at rush hour expect to get hit by an auto.',,would it be less
valid today?
How about,,'don't look directly at the sun,,it'll hurt your
eyes'?
No longer good advice?
Besides,,didn't you read this from the posted article?:
~"We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes
understood by Latinos . . . " Professor
Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University ~
Now,,just think,,if they took his advice in the early 90's,,you
wouldn't be aware of it still
going on,would you?
Why not?Because they would have,,'started using codes understood
by Latinos in order to
avoid 'white backlash'.
IOW,,it seems to have worked,ON YOU,so far.
~This is just more of the conservative mantra, "First I'll
make ya scared, then you'll listen" ,
but then again apparently it's working.~
Of course that works,,,and many use it regarding many things in
our 'free society'.
Like law enforcement,self defense products,'not having
insurance','drugs','guns','tobacco' and
conservatism it self.
And yet,,isn't it better than the opposite mantra?
You know,,The Ostrich Mantra,,'If I can't see it and ignore it
being there,,it can't hurt me.'
Or even The Ann Boline Mantra,,'Let them eat cake'.
Tossing my few centavos worth in,
The DANG - DInGIE American
aka,, The Evil White Man
Created on ... June 30, 2007
©Roy Harbin/The DANG &ndash DInGIE American/2007®
roy harbin is roy l.harbin aka,,the dang-dingie american
aka,,the evil white man
2007